The Engagement Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Engagement subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .08). 245) for the rationalist epistemology, t(1096) = – 8.42, p < .001, was in the opposite direction compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.119) for the constructivist epistemology, t(1096) = 4.08, p < .001, along the Engagement subscale.
The Attentional Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Attentional subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .18). The significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.396) for the rationalist epistemology t(1096) = , p < .001, was in the positive direction; whereas the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.129) for the constructivist epistemology t(1096) = –4.12, p < .001, which was in the negative direction along the Attentional subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology has more of a leaning towards a narrow focus on the Attentional subscale, and the constructivist epistemology leans more towards a broad focus on the Attentional subscale.
The Operative Subscale Lastly, epistemology was a significant predictor of the therapy style along the Operative subscale, F(2, 1093) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .256). The standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.461) for the rationalist epistemology was significant, t(1093) = , p < .0001 and in the positive direction, compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.170), for the constructivist epistemology, t(1093) = –6.50, p < .0001, which was in the negative direction along the Operative subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology tends towards more planning on the Operative subscale and the constructivist epistemology tends towards more spontaneity on the Operative subscale.
This supported brand new theory that the rationalist epistemology seems with the an excellent minimal standard of involvement into Engagement subscale additionally the constructivist epistemology seems to the an increased degree of involvement toward Engagement subscale
For this reason, epistemology (rationalist against. constructivist) is actually found to be a significant predictor of medication design. In particular, many powerful results give provisional help into the insight you to definitely there are specific variations in the personal brand of the newest counselor with regards to the therapists’ epistemic presumptions. Significantly more specifically, the modern study unearthed that therapists that have rationalist epistemologies tended towards the way more distance, a lower life expectancy degree of involvement, a narrower attract, and you can an increased standard of considered in their lessons that have customers, while, the newest constructivist epistemology tended toward that have an increased standard of intimacy, a heightened level of wedding, a broader appeal, and much more spontaneity within treatment training. As well, discover specific support towards sense that practitioners having constructivist epistemologies tend toward the fresh new assistance away from liberty in place of firmness during the its treatment concept; but not this was perhaps not a really strong wanting in the modern data.
These results are helpful in relation to brand new probably built-in variations managed because of the rationalist in the place of constructivist epistemologies predicated on treatment style. Alot more particularly, current conclusions contain the understanding that intellectual-behavioural treatments, and that represent an informed portrayal of your rationalist epistemology, care for an “active-directive” and you will health-related approach to medication (Granvold, 1988) which have specific specifications familiar with bundle the class of session (Mahoney Lyddon, 1988).
Hypothesis dos-Epistemology Affects the Therapeutic Relationship
Depending on the next theory-practitioners which have rationalist epistemologies tend to get large on Activity and you will Goal subscales and lower with the Bond subscale compared to the constructivist epistemologies-various other numerous linear regression model was sito web per incontri contadini used to decide if the same predictor adjustable (specialist epistemology) would dictate therapists’ feedback of the expectations variables (doing work alliance) predicated on therapists’ many three subscales-Task, Purpose, and you may Bond.